tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4701187830933248559.post739032755203491216..comments2008-07-25T09:19:09.916-04:00Jeff Barnardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13048085339848723604wormtowntaxi@charter.netBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4701187830933248559.post-44026140559652881202008-07-25T08:41:00.000-04:002008-07-25T08:41:00.000-04:00

"It also recommends that children not use cell phones except in emergencies.<BR/><BR/>"A child's developing organs 'are the most likely to be sensitive to any possible effects of exposure,' according to the document."<BR/><BR/>Ah, the old "WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN" strategy. Most kids and teens don't even talk on their phones anyway; they just send text messages. What, are they at

Seanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16619997549095168684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4701187830933248559.post-2422862779371118292008-07-24T16:27:43.562-04:002008-07-24T16:27:43.562-04:00

Yeah, this is an ongoing question that can certainly bear scrutiny, but this particular instance doesn't really carry the kind of weight that merits any coverage at all, basically.<BR/><BR/>I think Mike makes a good presentation of the facts, too.

Jeffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13048085339848723604noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4701187830933248559.post-33659428943584623042008-07-24T16:13:00.000-04:002008-07-24T16:13:00.000-04:00

This is the first mention of this story I've seen that says WTF?!<BR/><BR/>My first reading of it had the story going something like he did the research and told his staff and friend and family to limit cell phone use. Like this was some new secret. Sounded fishy to me just how the story got out.<BR/><BR/>I'd bet my Treo 650 that if you follow the money trail this "research" was funded by a

HoopyFrood42http://www.blogger.com/profile/06920064034837568591noreply@blogger.com